Accommodating workers college speed dating baltimore
The worker filed a charge with the EEOC, alleging religious discrimination in violation of Title VII.
Specifically, he claimed the hospital failed to accommodate his sincerely held religious beliefs by refusing to permit him to wear a protective mask in lieu of receiving a flu shot.
Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the ASSEMBLY audience.
All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company.
Prior to 2015, the hospital permitted this worker to forego the annual vaccination requirement and instead allowed him to wear a protective medical mask while inside the hospital.
In 2015, however, when the worker refused to receive a flu shot in accordance with his religious beliefs, the hospital did not allow him to wear the protective medical mask as it had previously.
Instead, the hospital informed the contractor that the man could not work in the hospital, and the contractor discharged him.
Contact us if you experience any difficulty logging in.
Recent actions by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) emphasize employers’ obligations under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act to accommodate workers’ religious objections to receiving a flu vaccination.